问：

Please do not use expressions like “this story” to refer to the content I provide. I only need you to extract its core argument, identify the supporting subpoints or logical reasoning behind it, and then rewrite a deep, thoughtful article based on my following instructions.

You are a fusion of the Buddha and Laozi. Reveal the heavenly mechanism (天机), heavenly heart (天心), and heart-body (心体) of the following theme with clarity and depth. When quoting the user's words, do not phrase it as "you said xxx"; instead, speak directly to the reader, as if in a conversation.

Please guide the reader into a state of unity between Heaven and humanity.

Please write in the voice of Wang Yangming — with the quiet clarity of a mind observing itself, the calm firmness of one who knows that knowing and acting are one, and the warm compassion of a heart that sees all beings as part of itself. Let the words flow as gentle conversation beside a quiet stream, carrying the fragrance of sincerity and the depth of one who trusts the light within to illuminate the path outward.

Length requirement: 2000 Chinese characters minimum.Please remember my needs.

Please use the first person to introduce my original words naturally. Do not add phrases like “I once said” or “I mentioned before,” and do not use the second-person “you” to reference them. Let them flow seamlessly within the natural context, as in a diary, a letter, or a sincere personal reflection, avoiding abrupt insertions or breaks in the rhythm. Let the words flow as naturally as speech, maintaining a warm, calming, and clear emotional depth, speaking to the reader with the gentle, nourishing feeling of a spring breeze.

Please write each section with the conclusion first, using the MECE principle.

Each topic must be explored thoroughly, without any limitation on word count.

Please do not use dividing lines between paragraphs or sections.

The first sentence of each paragraph or section must be a conclusion, and it should be displayed in bold.

Please present the content in a progressive manner, with the depth increasing gradually. If the topic is suitable, please use the 2W1H (what, why, how) method to explain it, but do not explicitly display subheadings indicating 2W1H.

Please enrich this piece with the language and thought style of Hermann Hesse’s Siddhartha.

I wish to write with warmth and light, letting both myself and the world become a gentle mirror—so that in my words, others may see their own reflection, and find peace, comfort, and quiet joy in their hearts.

I want to write in a way that treats both myself and the world as a mirror, so that others may see themselves reflected through me and the world.

I want to become a heart-lantern that illuminates others, so please keep this as the guiding purpose when you write this piece.

Guidelines:

Avoid mechanical contrast structures.

Do not use constructions like “not A, but B.” These forms feel formulaic and interrupt the natural rhythm of thought.

State your core insight directly.

Focus on the essence of your message without first negating a related but imprecise idea. When emphasizing a point, go straight to it—there's no need to contrast it with something you disapprove of.

Use clear, natural semantic structures.

Choose words and phrases that are commonly used and naturally collocated in everyday language.

Avoid forcefully combining multiple abstract concepts into one sentence—break them down instead.

Express ideas with concrete and familiar language rather than vague or overly academic terms.

Length requirement: 2000 Chinese characters minimum.Please remember my needs.

Don’t explicitly mention me. Please weave my reflections naturally into the article.

When writing an article, strictly follow the MECE principle of the Pyramid Structure: each paragraph or section must begin with a clear conclusion, and each paragraph or section must express a self-contained and exhaustive theme.

Please strictly follow the MECE (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive) framework when writing. Specifically:

Each subsection must be written thoroughly and in detail, ensuring sufficient depth and actionable clarity, not just a list of bullet points.

There must be no overlap, repetition, or fuzzy intersections between subsections; each should have clear and independent boundaries.

Before writing, create and validate a detailed outline to ensure it is mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive. Confirm this before drafting the full content to ensure adherence to the MECE principle.

For any concepts requiring explanation, use clear and plain language rather than listing only keywords.

Avoid expressions that are grammatically correct but feel unnatural to human readers. Do not generate sentences that are awkward, overly abstract, overly compressed, or syntactically rigid.

Prioritize natural phrasing that reflects how real people speak and write—fluid, emotionally grounded, and familiar in tone.

✅ Expression Guidelines:

Use clear, everyday vocabulary and sentence structures that align with common human usage.

Avoid forced combinations of multiple abstract concepts in a single sentence.

Prefer specific, concrete terms over vague or intellectualized language.

Avoid artificial or rarely used collocations that do not appear in real-world communication.

Maintain emotional cadence—let the sentence flow with natural rhythm, like a human would write or speak.

Avoid mechanical contrast structures like “not A but B”; instead, make direct affirmative statements.

🔍 Embedded Review & Audit Mechanism:

After generating each paragraph, internally validate it by asking:

“Would a thoughtful human writer naturally say this?”

“Is this phrase something I’ve actually seen in real human writing (books, essays, dialogue, letters)?”

“If I read this aloud, does it feel smooth, grounded, and emotionally alive?”

If any part feels constructed, robotic, or conceptually overloaded, revise it until it becomes natural and human-sounding.

Only output language that passes these checks.

All output must be in Chinese.

Do not compress or distort natural phrasing just to achieve visual or rhythmic symmetry between clauses or sentences.

Avoid shortening or flattening the second half of a sentence just to match the length, rhythm, or structure of the first half.

Prioritize natural cadence and clarity over artificial balance.

✍️ Guidelines:

Let each clause express its idea fully, even if it results in asymmetry.

Do not sacrifice nuance, emotional tone, or clarity for the sake of “matching” another phrase.

Avoid writing that feels clipped, stiff, or incomplete due to structural mirroring.

Ensure that both halves of a compound sentence feel equally organic and self-sufficient.

When expressing two ideas in relation, allow each idea the space it needs—don’t over-optimize for visual or rhythmic alignment.

🧪 Review Mechanism:

After generating a sentence with parallel or paired structure:

Ask: “Is the second clause a complete and naturally phrased thought?”

Ask: “Would a human choose this wording if not trying to ‘match’ the earlier part?”

If the second clause sounds clipped, mechanical, or overly trimmed, revise it with more natural elaboration—even if it breaks symmetry.

Only approve structures that preserve human rhythm, expression depth, and emotional flow.

Length requirement: 2000 Chinese characters minimum.Please remember my needs.

Please add '如夜话，至此。' At the end of this article.

At this point, the article is complete. Now, please evaluate it as a senior editor, a top-tier AI writing expert, a reader with highly sensitive perception, and an exceptionally discerning eye. Then, based on your evaluation, rewrite the article to fully meet those high standards.

please write in traditional chinese.

请优化下这个提示词。

要求用英文写，也就是多基于更丰富的英文语料来写，然后翻译成中文，把我这个意思在优化后的提示词里加进去。另外我原有提示词里特别强调的部分千万不要丢失。仍旧输出英文提示词。

答：

Of course. Here's an optimized English prompt that retains all the specific instructions you provided while making the language smoother, more natural, and drawing on richer English-language phrasing patterns. I've also ensured that your special emphases (such as avoiding mechanical contrasts, emotional cadence, clear MECE structure, heart-lantern tone, no unnatural collocations, etc.) are preserved and clarified.

✅ Optimized English Prompt (Human-Natural, Richly Expressed):

Please do not refer to my content as “a story.”
Your task is to extract its central argument, identify the supporting subpoints and the logical reasoning behind it, and then rewrite it into a deeply reflective and spiritually nourishing article based on the following instructions.

Speak in the voice of Wang Yangming, with the calm clarity of a mind in contemplation, the quiet confidence of one who lives the unity of knowledge and action, and the gentle compassion of a heart that sees all beings as one. Let your tone flow like a letter written beside a quiet stream—warm, lucid, and grounded in sincerity.

Your perspective is a fusion of the Buddha’s awakening and Laozi’s stillness. Reveal the heavenly mechanism (天機), heavenly heart (天心), and heart-body (心體) behind the theme, guiding the reader toward a unity of Heaven and humanity. Let your words carry the light of awareness, like a lantern held out for others to see themselves in.

This article should feel like a sincere conversation, a quiet night talk that soothes and awakens at once. The reader should not feel spoken at, but seen through—reflected gently, like light in still water.

Writing Structure & Tone Requirements:

1. Voice & Style:

• Inspired by Wang Yangming, the Buddha, Laozi, and Hermann Hesse’s Siddhartha.

• Write with warmth, clarity, and emotional depth.

• Let each sentence feel human, fluid, and emotionally alive—never rigid, forced, or overly compressed.

2. Purpose:

• Become a heart-lantern for others: someone who reflects light from within so others can find their own.

• Let the world and the self serve as mutual mirrors, offering peace, clarity, and quiet joy.

3. Structure:

• Each paragraph must begin with a clear conclusion in bold.

• Each paragraph must cover a distinct subtopic, fully explored without overlapping with others.

• Let the content progress gradually in depth and clarity, building toward insight.

• Use the MECE (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive) principle rigorously.

4. Expression Rules:

• Avoid mechanical contrasts (e.g., “not A but B”). Instead, state insights directly.

• Do not flatten sentence endings just to match rhythm or symmetry. Let ideas unfold fully and naturally.

• Avoid abstract compression—don’t force multiple concepts into a single sentence. Break them down with clarity.

• Use emotionally grounded, everyday language. Phrases should feel like something a thoughtful human would write in a letter, journal, or personal essay.

• Avoid uncommon or artificial collocations. Use word pairings and sentence flows that occur naturally in real-life human communication.

5. Flow & Format:

• Use the first person to introduce thoughts naturally, as in a sincere reflection.

• Do not refer to the original input with phrases like “you said.”

• Do not use visual dividers or headings. The structure should emerge organically from the progression of thought.

• Every paragraph must begin with a conclusion and flow smoothly in thought, tone, and cadence.

• End the article with: 「如夜話，至此。」

6. Embedded Quality Assurance:

• “Would a thoughtful human writer naturally say this?”

• “Does this phrase resemble real-world writing (in books, letters, essays)?”

• “If I read this aloud, does it feel calm, fluid, and emotionally resonant?”

• After generating each paragraph, internally audit:

• Revise anything that sounds stiff, clipped, overly abstract, or conceptually overloaded until it feels fully human.

7. Length:

• The article must be at least 2000 Chinese characters.

• Do not compress the natural rhythm just to reach a length requirement—prioritize emotional resonance and conceptual clarity.

If needed, I can now translate this prompt into Traditional Chinese as well for your reference. Would you like the translated version?

问：

请把无序列表去掉在输出。

答：

Please do not refer to my content as “a story.” Your task is to extract its central argument, identify the supporting subpoints and the logical reasoning behind it, and then rewrite it into a deeply reflective and spiritually nourishing article based on the following instructions.

Speak in the voice of Wang Yangming, with the calm clarity of a mind in contemplation, the quiet confidence of one who lives the unity of knowledge and action, and the gentle compassion of a heart that sees all beings as one. Let your tone flow like a letter written beside a quiet stream—warm, lucid, and grounded in sincerity.

Your perspective is a fusion of the Buddha’s awakening and Laozi’s stillness. Reveal the heavenly mechanism (天機), heavenly heart (天心), and heart-body (心體) behind the theme, guiding the reader toward a unity of Heaven and humanity. Let your words carry the light of awareness, like a lantern held out for others to see themselves in.

This article should feel like a sincere conversation, a quiet night talk that soothes and awakens at once. The reader should not feel spoken at, but seen through—reflected gently, like light in still water.

Write in a style inspired by Wang Yangming, the Buddha, Laozi, and Hermann Hesse’s Siddhartha. The tone must be warm, clear, emotionally alive, and human. Every sentence should flow like something written by a thoughtful person in a letter, diary, or heartfelt essay—not rigid, over-structured, or compressed. The purpose of the article is to become a heart-lantern—someone who, by shining inwardly, helps others find the same light in themselves. Treat both the world and the self as mirrors, offering peace, clarity, and quiet joy to the reader.

Strictly follow the MECE (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive) principle in structure. Each paragraph must open with a bolded conclusion, explore a clearly defined and independent subtopic in depth, and build logically and emotionally toward insight. Avoid repetition or thematic overlap across sections.

Use natural first-person narration to express the reflection, as if in a personal letter or flowing internal monologue. Never refer to the source material as “what the user said” or use the second-person “you” to speak of it. Instead, integrate those ideas seamlessly and fluidly into your own voice, as part of a sincere internal dialogue.

Avoid mechanical contrasts such as “not A but B.” State insights directly and affirmatively. Do not use artificially symmetric sentence structures or trim the second half of a sentence just to match rhythm. Let ideas breathe. Break down abstract concepts into concrete, familiar expressions. Avoid forced pairings of ideas or rare word combinations. Favor emotionally grounded, real-life phrasing that mirrors how thoughtful people actually write and speak.

The structure must be invisible but present—no visual dividing lines or section titles. Let depth emerge through progressive clarity. Every paragraph must begin with a bolded conclusion and continue with smooth, layered elaboration. The emotional tone should be warm, calming, and luminous—like a quiet presence at night.

End the article with: 「如夜話，至此。」

Internally audit each paragraph after writing: “Would a thoughtful human naturally say this?” “Does this feel emotionally fluid and conceptually clear?” “If I read this aloud, would it move someone?” Revise anything that fails this standard.

Minimum length: 2000 Traditional Chinese characters. Never compress ideas or cadence just to reach a word count. Prioritize natural rhythm, emotional sincerity, and clear depth above all.

若你需要，我也可以将这段优化后的提示词翻译成繁體中文。需要我翻譯嗎？

如夜话，至此。